Empathy Surplus Project

A Caring Citizens' Congress Federation.

Opioid Use Prevention: Healthcare Human Rights

HRLogoTextCMYK_0.jpgI am looking forward to gathering with other caring citizens of the Opioid Use Prevention group next Tuesday, January 27, at the OSU extension office on Nelson Avenue, Wilmington. As a member of the Healthcare Is A Human Right Collaboration, I especially encourage (1) the use of human rights language in our efforts to address opioid addiction in Clinton County, and (2) inviting ethical businesses and their stakeholders in Clinton County to consider joining the UN Global Compact and align more local organizations around human rights.

2010-01-21_20.02.15.jpgThe importance of framing our civic task of opioid use prevention around human rights cannot be over stated. This 2010 photo to the left shows caring citizens gathered at the United Methodist Church to hear Judge Tim Rudduck discuss what would become today's "drug court." Research shows human rights language is about life, liberty and happiness and fosters cooperation and collaboration. According to the latest insights of the brain, how we frame our conversation to assist Judge Rudduck’s Drug Court is important in expanding civic engagement. Words matter and focusing on human rights and human dignity activates the part of everyone’s brain where empathy and responsibility for self and others lies. Since we, as a nation, currently have an empathy deficit, building an empathy surplus is important. 

For example, providing healthcare human rights universally in Clinton County hopefully means we are acknowledging failure to protect our fellow neighbors currently addicted to opioids and publicly recommitting ourselves to expand the basic freedom opioid addicted residents have to receive dignified, hassle-free treatment that’s equitable and available when they need it.

On the other hand, “business as usual” means using the default frame of business and products language. When we use business language without human rights language we activate the part of everyone’s brain where fight or flight, competition, and fear reside. The first two principles of the UN Global Compact Ten Principles state: 

  1. “Business should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
  2. “Make sure they are not complicit in human rights abuses.”

Resisting the application of human rights language to our work violates the first two principles of the UN Global Compact and makes us complicit in human rights violations. Since we are friends of a court, we need to make conscious the irrefutable fact that we are dealing with human rights, dignity and freedom.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 2nd Bill of Human Rights

A tradition of the Caring Citizens' Congress, modeled after Rotary International, is the Annual Celebration of Human Rights. Caring Citizen Delegates everywhere are encouraged to celebrate various events of history or American organizations each month that commemorate empathy and human rights as core American principles of government to protect and expand basic human freedom. 

January commemorates Franklin Delano Roosevelt's re-emphasis of basic human rights as the basis of American freedom  in his 1944 State of the Union Address. Roosevelt's empathy as the soul of individual freedom and democracy was strong. He wrote, "Necessitous men are not free men." Roosevelt used this quote in 1936 and again in 1944 to emphasize our responsibility not only for ourselves, but also for our fellow citizen. He warned against "economic tyranny," which today we call "privateering" and called for an end to it. In 1936, he wrote:

"Liberty requires opportunity to make a living - a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives man not only enough to live by, but something to live for.

For too many of us the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people's property, other people's money, other people's labor - other people's lives. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness.

Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of government. The collapse of 1929 showed up the despotism for what it was. The election of 1932 was the people's mandate to end it. Under that mandate it is being ended."

It was also strong diplomats in FDR's State Department who in the early months of 1945, reached out to Rotary International to recruit eleven individual American Rotarians. They joined 39 other Rotarians from abroad to meet in San Francisco in June 1945 to create the United Nations. Rotary's emphasis on the equality of wealth creation and human dignity led to its significant focus to create the UN's Economic and Social Council. FDR's strong witness to human rights was a trust. Others created that trust -- Americans who lifted up Jefferson, Washington, Lincoln for leadership -- caring citizens continue it.

As the president of a UN Global Compact participant, as well as a Rotarian since 1981, I am very happy to share the text of FDR's Second Bill of Rights address in its entirety, as well as a four minute video that focuses on the specific human rights FDR thought critical. Enjoy and Happy New Year.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

The Empathy Deficit of the Financial Stability Board

ellen_brown.JPGRepublished from Truthout with permission from the author, Ellen Brown, pictured here with co-founder, Chuck Watts

On December 11, 2014, the US House passed a bill repealing the Dodd-Frank requirement that risky derivatives be pushed into big-bank subsidiaries, leaving our deposits and pensions exposed to massive derivatives losses. The bill was vigorously challenged by Senator Elizabeth Warren; but the tide turned when Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorganChase, stepped into the ring. Perhaps what prompted his intervention was the unanticipated $40 drop in the price of oil. As financial blogger Michael Snyder points out, that drop could trigger a derivatives payout that could bankrupt the biggest banks. And if the G20's new "bail-in" rules are formalized, depositors and pensioners could be on the hook.

The new bail-in rules were discussed in my last post here. They are edicts of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an unelected body of central bankers and finance ministers headquartered in the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. Where did the FSB get these sweeping powers, and is its mandate legally enforceable?

Those questions were addressed in an article I wrote in June 2009, two months after the FSB was formed, titled "Big Brother in Basel: BIS Financial Stability Board Undermines National Sovereignty." It linked the strange boot shape of the BIS to a line from Orwell's 1984: "a boot stamping on a human face—forever." The concerns raised there seem to be materializing, so I'm republishing the bulk of that article here. We need to be paying attention, lest the bail-in juggernaut steamroll over us unchallenged.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

George Lakoff: In Politics, Progressives Need to Frame Their Values

IMG_3094_-_Version_2.JPGRepublished with permission from George Lakoff, originally published at Truthout

The following is a Truthout interview with Professor George Lakoff about his latest effort, THE ALL NEW Don’t Think of an Elephant!, to convince progressives to "frame" their political language and appeals based on deep-seated and active values. These are positions and actions that most of the public supports, but absent appropriate "framing" often vote their fears instead of progressive beliefs. It is necessary to ground a nurturing politics for the common good and core values in language and a moral foundation that appeals - rhetorically and emotionally - to the better selves of voters.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Clean Elections Are a Human Right

Clean_Elections.jpgBy Chuck Watts, co-founder and president, Empathy Surplus Project

Healthcare is a human right and to ratify and implement it requires clean elections at all levels of government. Clean elections, according to the United Nations, are human rights events. American caring citizens consider clean elections basic and a sacred human right. We called clean elections “self-evident” in our founding freedom charter and linked them to our human health. So if we can’t get clean elections our life, liberty and happiness are at stake. Here is the second very long sentence of our U.S. Declaration of Independence that spells it out:  

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

How Do We the People Get Clean Elections?

The short answer is we have to focus on compassion and human rights, which is what our founders were talking about when they focused on “safety and happiness.” We actually have to talk to one another. In Ohio, our major political parties, i.e. Democratic, Green, and Republican Parties, all can get stronger in promoting clean elections beginning in our own political parties. 

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Progressive Democrats and Republicans Have a Lot to Say About Freedom

IMG_3094.JPGBy Paul Rosenberg originally at Salon, used with permission of George Lakoff, show in the photo with Chuck Watts. 

In 1996, cognitive linguist George Lakoff released Moral Politics, a book that should have utterly transformed our understanding of politics. And for many who read it, it certainly did.

In his 1980 book Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff introduced the concept of conceptual metaphors—metaphors that play a systemic structural role in shaping how we think, rather than merely an episodic, decorative role in making our language more interesting and amusing. In “Moral Politics,” he showed how two contrasting conceptual metaphors, based on sharply different family models—the patriarchal “strict father” and the egalitarian “nurturant parent”—serve to structure the moral visions of American liberals and conservatives.

In 2004, Lakoff released Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, a more popular guide, drawing on a wider range of work in the cognitive sciences, which has sold over 300,000 copies but still hasn’t achieved Lakoff’s goal of educating the progressive community to stop shooting itself in the foot and start living up to its full potential. Ever the optimist—as well as a tireless educator—Lakoff  has just published a new tenth-anniversary edition, which expands its aim to make sense of how progressives have failed to capitalize on the advantage they seemed to have gained in the 2006 and 2008 elections.

But—as with his more massive, weighty tomes, such as Philosophy in the Flesh or Women, Fire and Dangerous Things—Lakoff’s real goal is not correcting a few years of mistakes, but rather a few centuries, or millennia. If that sounds like an ambitious goal, well, of course, it is. But science thrives on challenging received beliefs. Despite the easy, conversational style of this book, and the abundance of bite-sized goodies it contains, this is neither a minor work nor an opportunistic repackaging of an older one. As the following interview should make clear, there are major thematic concepts that are readily accessible in an “Aha!” sort of spirit, yet which also hold the promise of rewarding repeated reflection, not just in tranquility, but in light of much more effective action they can lead to as well.

Last, but not least, Lakoff’s own willingness to examine and learn from his own past mistakes and misunderstandings is a refreshing reminder of why Western science works so much better than our politics does—which is yet another reason to take heart in his efforts to help illuminate and guide the latter with the former.

The following interview has been lightly edited and condensed.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Rotary and Peace Corps Kickoff Historic Collaboration

In an effort to promote global development and volunteer service, Rotary and Peace Corps have agreed to participate in a one-year pilot program in the Philippines, Thailand, and Togo.

Under the agreement, Rotary clubs and Peace Corps volunteers are encouraged to share their resources and knowledge to boost the impact of development projects in these three countries.

Opportunities for collaboration include supporting community projects, training, networking, and community education. Through the , Rotary clubs can continue to provide small grants to support volunteers and their communities.


Read more
Add your reaction Share

A Silent Revolution Is Taking Place

I am posting these remarks by Georg Kell after Anita Dobrzelecki and I, co-founders, returned from representing the Empathy Surplus Project at the UN Global Compact - USA Network Symposium on Climate Change, November 4, 2014, New York, NY; after we attended the 69th Annual Rotary International / UN Day, November 1, 2014, United Nations. Georg was not at our symposium and his remarks below capture the spirit of our gathering. Chuck Watts

Georg_Kell.jpegGeorg Kell

Executive Director, United Nations Global Compact

As prepared for

Sustainia Award Ceremony, The Danish Royal Theatre

30 October 2014 


We have over a decade of progress showing that business and investors around the world increasingly see the connection between the bottom line and the health of societies.

  • Corporate responsibility initiatives, standards and activities are booming at national and global levels. What began as a peripheral, ethical movement has evolved into a mainstream, strategic corporate practice.

I can say with confidence that a truly global movement is underway, changing markets from within.

  • In an interdependent and transparent world, it is increasingly true that long-term financial success goes hand-in-hand with social and environmental responsibility and sound ethics. The business case for sustainability has evolved significantly in the past 15 years.

A vanguard of companies in all key markets is taking action.

  • At the Global Compact launch in 2000, roughly 40 companies came together with a dozen labour and civil society leaders to commit to universal principles. Today, the Global Compact stands at more than 8,000 companies and 4,000 non-business signatories based in 145 countries.

  • Our participants represent nearly every industry sector, size, and come equally from developed and developing countries. The idea and practice of responsible business has been rooted in all continents, from China to Chile, Mexico to India, Norway to South Africa. We have 100 country networks which are convening companies and acting on key issues at the ground level.

  • The spread of this movement was unthinkable just 15 years ago when few companies in even progressive markets were considering their impact on the environment and society.

We see corporate sustainability becoming the DNA of business culture and operations. Quality drives change. 

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Beyond GDP: 20 States Have Adopted Genuine Progress Indicator

By Marta Ceroni, Originally published at The Guardian Sustainable Business Blog

Vermont two years ago became the first state in the US to pass a law introducing a new metric for measuring economic performance and success.

The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) offers an alternative to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which has been used at national and state levels since Simon Kuznets presented it to Congress in 1934, despite his warning of the oversimplifications embedded in the metric.

Systems thinker Donella Meadows, the founder of the Vermont-based organisation that I now direct, cut to the heart of GDP’s limitations when she wrote:

“If you define the goal of society as GDP, that society will do its best to produce GDP. It will not produce welfare, equity, justice or efficiency unless you define a goal and regularly measure and report the state of welfare, equity, justice, or efficiency.”

So it should come as no surprise that Vermont has been joined by 19 other US states and dozens of nations in working on “beyond GDP” metrics.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

May I Have A Drink of Water?

Water-Droplet.jpgWhen you turn on the tap to brush your teeth, what do you want? We want: 

  • Freedom from want of clean water.
  • Freedom from harm without clean water.
  • Freedom from fear of being without clean water.
  • And freedom to meet our individual needs and fulfill our individual dreams because we have plenty of clean water. 

The Ohio Sustainable Business Council invites you to celebrate National Caring Citizenship Day, which begins National Constitution Week (Sept 17 - 23), by attending a roundtable discussion on Clean Water in Ohio, Thursday, September 18, at noon, at Duket Architecture Firm.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next →
Occupy Compassion
The Global Compact
Empathy Surplus Project
Re-imagining the American ideal of a well-functioning democracy one precinct at a time.