Now, more than ever, we want a moral foreign policy steeped in a strategy of generosity that realizes America can only be a #CaringSociety if the world is a caring world. This is the definition of a stronger world, a stronger America, and a stronger Israel. What you offer is ungenerous and uncaring. We stand on our strong caring character. We, Jewish and non-Jewish Americans, want a stronger America in a stronger and caring society, based on caring and responsibility to answer the world’s problems. Like our parents before us, who gave us the Marshall Plan in Europe, and joined Rotarians from all over the world in San Francisco to build the United Nations, we want a new Global Marshall Plan to build our caring world.
At a time when terrorist threats come from gangs of criminals versus states, when “free markets” exist without freedom, when overpopulation threatens stability and disastrous global warming, when intolerant cultures limit freedom and promote violence, when unethical transnational corporations privateer freedom for profit like oppressive governments, when an oil economy threatens our very existence, the central problems in today’s world are solved by #CaringCitizens who combine state-level approaches with caring society approaches.
On February 20, 2015, at 10 a.m. at the U.S. State Department Building on 21st Street, Washington, DC, in the George C. Marshall Conference Room, I joined one other member of the Working Group on Healthcare Human Rights of the UPR, Universal Periodic Review. The UPR was created in 2006 by the General Assembly of the United Nations to evaluate member states human rights record.
This is the 70th year of the UN's existence, the only institution of its kind that promotes basic human rights. The UPR, which is only 9 years old, is the first process of its kind in the world which focuses on evaluating the human rights. It took five years, from 2006 - 2011, to complete the first UPR, and I was participating in the 2nd round of a process I am only beginning to understand.
Mary Gerisch, Chairwomen of the Working Group on Healthcare Human Rights, and I, joined about 50 other members of "civil society" admitted by the State Department to give and listen to testimony. Mary and I sat at a large conference table with microphones at each seat. It was standing room only. My 2 minute statement, like that of others, was focused on how well our fellow caring citizens and our elected representatives in our particular communities are respecting, protecting and promoting human rights.
My statement focused on the conversations concerning healthcare human rights I have had since 2008, when DHL announced their decision to close their shipping operation. DHL had only two years early acquired Wilmington's Airborne Express, which at the time enjoyed about a 15 percent market share. In particular I invited State Department to visit our website to see the more than 100 photo petitioners who had promised to use our healthcare human rights talking points. And even more specifically, I zeroed in on sharing two of 40 questions and the answers, I had used in interviewing 69 caring citizens over the twelve months of 2014.
On a personal note, I was able to make contact by text with Wilmington native, Drew McCracken, Chief of Staff, US State Department, Public Policy Department. Our schedules didn't allow us to have lunch together, but we did make contact. I am reminded of my AM Rotary Club's sponsorship of Drew's Ambassadorial Scholarship to the London School of Economics, if my memory serves me well.
I am looking forward to gathering with other caring citizens of the Opioid Use Prevention group next Tuesday, January 27, at the OSU extension office on Nelson Avenue, Wilmington. As a member of the Healthcare Is A Human Right Collaboration, I especially encourage (1) the use of human rights language in our efforts to address opioid addiction in Clinton County, and (2) inviting ethical businesses and their stakeholders in Clinton County to consider joining the UN Global Compact and align more local organizations around human rights.
The importance of framing our civic task of opioid use prevention around human rights cannot be over stated. This 2010 photo to the left shows caring citizens gathered at the United Methodist Church to hear Judge Tim Rudduck discuss what would become today's "drug court." Research shows human rights language is about life, liberty and happiness and fosters cooperation and collaboration. According to the latest insights of the brain, how we frame our conversation to assist Judge Rudduck’s Drug Court is important in expanding civic engagement. Words matter and focusing on human rights and human dignity activates the part of everyone’s brain where empathy and responsibility for self and others lies. Since we, as a nation, currently have an empathy deficit, building an empathy surplus is important.
For example, providing healthcare human rights universally in Clinton County hopefully means we are acknowledging failure to protect our fellow neighbors currently addicted to opioids and publicly recommitting ourselves to expand the basic freedom opioid addicted residents have to receive dignified, hassle-free treatment that’s equitable and available when they need it.
On the other hand, “business as usual” means using the default frame of business and products language. When we use business language without human rights language we activate the part of everyone’s brain where fight or flight, competition, and fear reside. The first two principles of the UN Global Compact Ten Principles state:
- “Business should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
- “Make sure they are not complicit in human rights abuses.”
Resisting the application of human rights language to our work violates the first two principles of the UN Global Compact and makes us complicit in human rights violations. Since we are friends of a court, we need to make conscious the irrefutable fact that we are dealing with human rights, dignity and freedom.
A tradition of the Caring Citizens' Congress, modeled after Rotary International, is the Annual Celebration of Human Rights. Caring Citizen Delegates everywhere are encouraged to celebrate various events of history or American organizations each month that commemorate empathy and human rights as core American principles of government to protect and expand basic human freedom.
January commemorates Franklin Delano Roosevelt's re-emphasis of basic human rights as the basis of American freedom in his 1944 State of the Union Address. Roosevelt's empathy as the soul of individual freedom and democracy was strong. He wrote, "Necessitous men are not free men." Roosevelt used this quote in 1936 and again in 1944 to emphasize our responsibility not only for ourselves, but also for our fellow citizen. He warned against "economic tyranny," which today we call "privateering" and called for an end to it. In 1936, he wrote:
"Liberty requires opportunity to make a living - a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives man not only enough to live by, but something to live for.
For too many of us the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people's property, other people's money, other people's labor - other people's lives. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness.
Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of government. The collapse of 1929 showed up the despotism for what it was. The election of 1932 was the people's mandate to end it. Under that mandate it is being ended."
It was also strong diplomats in FDR's State Department who in the early months of 1945, reached out to Rotary International to recruit eleven individual American Rotarians. They joined 39 other Rotarians from abroad to meet in San Francisco in June 1945 to create the United Nations. Rotary's emphasis on the equality of wealth creation and human dignity led to its significant focus to create the UN's Economic and Social Council. FDR's strong witness to human rights was a trust. Others created that trust -- Americans who lifted up Jefferson, Washington, Lincoln for leadership -- caring citizens continue it.
As the president of a UN Global Compact participant, as well as a Rotarian since 1981, I am very happy to share the text of FDR's Second Bill of Rights address in its entirety, as well as a four minute video that focuses on the specific human rights FDR thought critical. Enjoy and Happy New Year.
Republished from Truthout with permission from the author, Ellen Brown, pictured here with co-founder, Chuck Watts
On December 11, 2014, the US House passed a bill repealing the Dodd-Frank requirement that risky derivatives be pushed into big-bank subsidiaries, leaving our deposits and pensions exposed to massive derivatives losses. The bill was vigorously challenged by Senator Elizabeth Warren; but the tide turned when Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorganChase, stepped into the ring. Perhaps what prompted his intervention was the unanticipated $40 drop in the price of oil. As financial blogger Michael Snyder points out, that drop could trigger a derivatives payout that could bankrupt the biggest banks. And if the G20's new "bail-in" rules are formalized, depositors and pensioners could be on the hook.
The new bail-in rules were discussed in my last post here. They are edicts of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an unelected body of central bankers and finance ministers headquartered in the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. Where did the FSB get these sweeping powers, and is its mandate legally enforceable?
Those questions were addressed in an article I wrote in June 2009, two months after the FSB was formed, titled "Big Brother in Basel: BIS Financial Stability Board Undermines National Sovereignty." It linked the strange boot shape of the BIS to a line from Orwell's 1984: "a boot stamping on a human face—forever." The concerns raised there seem to be materializing, so I'm republishing the bulk of that article here. We need to be paying attention, lest the bail-in juggernaut steamroll over us unchallenged.
Republished with permission from George Lakoff, originally published at Truthout
The following is a Truthout interview with Professor George Lakoff about his latest effort, THE ALL NEW Don’t Think of an Elephant!, to convince progressives to "frame" their political language and appeals based on deep-seated and active values. These are positions and actions that most of the public supports, but absent appropriate "framing" often vote their fears instead of progressive beliefs. It is necessary to ground a nurturing politics for the common good and core values in language and a moral foundation that appeals - rhetorically and emotionally - to the better selves of voters.
By Chuck Watts, co-founder and president, Empathy Surplus Project
Healthcare is a human right and to ratify and implement it requires clean elections at all levels of government. Clean elections, according to the United Nations, are human rights events. American caring citizens consider clean elections basic and a sacred human right. We called clean elections “self-evident” in our founding freedom charter and linked them to our human health. So if we can’t get clean elections our life, liberty and happiness are at stake. Here is the second very long sentence of our U.S. Declaration of Independence that spells it out:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
How Do We the People Get Clean Elections?
The short answer is we have to focus on compassion and human rights, which is what our founders were talking about when they focused on “safety and happiness.” We actually have to talk to one another. In Ohio, our major political parties, i.e. Democratic, Green, and Republican Parties, all can get stronger in promoting clean elections beginning in our own political parties.
By Paul Rosenberg originally at Salon, used with permission of George Lakoff, show in the photo with Chuck Watts.
In 1996, cognitive linguist George Lakoff released Moral Politics, a book that should have utterly transformed our understanding of politics. And for many who read it, it certainly did.
In his 1980 book Metaphors We Live By
, Lakoff introduced the concept of conceptual metaphors—metaphors that play a systemic structural role in shaping how we think, rather than merely an episodic, decorative role in making our language more interesting and amusing. In “Moral Politics,” he showed how two contrasting conceptual metaphors, based on sharply different family models—the patriarchal “strict father” and the egalitarian “nurturant parent”—serve to structure the moral visions of American liberals and conservatives.
In 2004, Lakoff released Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, a more popular guide, drawing on a wider range of work in the cognitive sciences, which has sold over 300,000 copies but still hasn’t achieved Lakoff’s goal of educating the progressive community to stop shooting itself in the foot and start living up to its full potential. Ever the optimist—as well as a tireless educator—Lakoff has just published a new tenth-anniversary edition, which expands its aim to make sense of how progressives have failed to capitalize on the advantage they seemed to have gained in the 2006 and 2008 elections.
But—as with his more massive, weighty tomes, such as Philosophy in the Flesh or Women, Fire and Dangerous Things—Lakoff’s real goal is not correcting a few years of mistakes, but rather a few centuries, or millennia. If that sounds like an ambitious goal, well, of course, it is. But science thrives on challenging received beliefs. Despite the easy, conversational style of this book, and the abundance of bite-sized goodies it contains, this is neither a minor work nor an opportunistic repackaging of an older one. As the following interview should make clear, there are major thematic concepts that are readily accessible in an “Aha!” sort of spirit, yet which also hold the promise of rewarding repeated reflection, not just in tranquility, but in light of much more effective action they can lead to as well.
Last, but not least, Lakoff’s own willingness to examine and learn from his own past mistakes and misunderstandings is a refreshing reminder of why Western science works so much better than our politics does—which is yet another reason to take heart in his efforts to help illuminate and guide the latter with the former.
The following interview has been lightly edited and condensed.